Common Myths About Polyamory and Open Relationships

Polyamory and open relationships are often misunderstood. From assumptions about endless sex to doubts about emotional depth, myths can make consensual non-monogamy seem riskier or less serious than it is. This article examines common misconceptions and what the evidence actually shows.
Key takeaways
- Consensual non-monogamy is not just about sex; polyamory emphasizes emotional and romantic connections.
- Research suggests people in CNM relationships often practice safer sex and get tested more than monogamous people who have outside partners.
- Polyamory and polygamy are different, and polyamory is not a sexuality.
- Relationship quality and psychological well-being can be similar in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships.
- Cheating can happen in any relationship structure; consent and honesty are what make non-monogamy ethical.
Myth: It's really just about having more sex
A persistent stereotype is that people choose consensual non-monogamy because they want a higher quantity of sexual partners. While some forms of non-monogamy, such as swinging, do emphasize recreational sex, polyamory places more weight on romantic and emotional bonds with multiple partners[1]. The motivations are varied and cannot be reduced to a single drive.
In swinging, practitioners do report that more and better sex is one reason they participate, and some couples describe it as a healthy outlet that strengthens their relationship[2]. However, that is only one corner of the non-monogamous landscape. Polyamorous relationships are defined by emotional closeness, not just physical contact[5].
People in consensually non-monogamous relationships also describe benefits that have nothing to do with sex, such as having different needs met by different partners, sharing a wider range of activities, and feeling greater autonomy and personal growth[3]. The idea that everyone is simply chasing novelty misunderstands the emotional and practical reasons people choose these structures.
Myth: Non-monogamy is riskier for sexual health
It is easy to assume that having more partners automatically means more sexually transmitted infections. But research suggests the picture is more nuanced. In one study, people in consensually non-monogamous relationships reported more lifetime sexual partners than monogamous participants, yet they were also more likely to use condoms with both primary and additional partners and more likely to have been tested for STIs[6].
The same study found that about a quarter of monogamous participants had sex outside their primary relationship, and most of those partners did not know about the infidelity[6]. Despite the higher number of partners among consensually non-monogamous participants, the precautions they took did not appear to raise their STI rate above what can happen when monogamy is not practiced consistently[6].
Other research supports this pattern. People in consensually non-monogamous relationships are more likely to practice safer sex and less likely to use condoms incorrectly than people who have outside partners while in supposedly monogamous relationships[1]. Swinging communities also tend to accept safer sex practices as a norm, and many swingers adjusted their behavior in response to HIV/AIDS[2]. None of this means risk disappears, but it does challenge the myth that non-monogamy is inherently careless. Anyone with questions about sexual health should speak with a qualified clinician.
Myth: Polyamory is the same as polygamy
Polyamory and polygamy are often confused, but they are vastly different concepts. Polygamy refers to the practice of having multiple spouses, while polyamory is a form of consensual non-monogamy that involves multiple romantic or sexual partners without a legal or religious marriage framework[8].
Polyamory is also not a sexuality. It is a relationship structure or practice, and people of any sexual orientation can be in polyamorous relationships[8]. The term ethical non-monogamy is sometimes used interchangeably with polyamory, though polyamory is technically a subset of the broader category of consensual non-monogamy[1].
Because human romantic and sexual relationships are fluid and complex, many arrangements do not fit neatly into one label[1]. Understanding the distinctions helps reduce stigma and allows people to describe their relationships more accurately.
Myth: Polyamorous relationships are less committed or less happy
Some people assume that dividing time and attention among multiple partners means each relationship is shallower. Research does not support this. General trends in the literature suggest that people in consensually non-monogamous relationships report similar psychological well-being and relationship quality to people in monogamous relationships[7].
Polyamorous relationships can be happy and healthy, just like monogamous ones, though they may require more honesty, communication, and care because more people are involved[8]. Commitment is not measured by exclusivity alone. Many polyamorous people describe deep, long-term commitments to multiple partners.
Even within polyamory, not all relationships look the same. Some people have primary and secondary partners, while others reject hierarchy altogether. Research has found that co-primary and non-primary relationships can be close to people's ideals on measures like commitment and satisfaction, even when practical differences in investment or time remain[5]. The presence of multiple partners does not automatically dilute emotional depth.
Myth: If you're polyamorous, you can't be monogamous—and vice versa
People sometimes treat monogamy and non-monogamy as fixed identities that cannot overlap. In reality, a monogamous person can date someone who is polyamorous, an arrangement sometimes called a mono-poly relationship[8]. These relationships can work when both people are honest about their needs and boundaries.
It is also possible for someone to move between relationship styles over time. Around a quarter of Americans have engaged in a consensually non-monogamous relationship at some point in their lives, while a smaller percentage are in one at any given time[1]. This suggests that for many people, non-monogamy is a phase or an experiment rather than a permanent identity.
The key is not matching labels perfectly, but matching expectations. A mono-poly couple might negotiate how much information is shared, how time is divided, and what forms of intimacy are allowed outside the dyad. These conversations are practical, not impossible.
Myth: Non-monogamy means there is no cheating
Some people believe that because non-monogamy allows multiple partners, cheating cannot exist. That is not true. Cheating or abuse can happen in polyamorous relationships just as in monogamous ones[8]. The defining feature of ethical non-monogamy is consent. If someone breaks an agreement, hides a partner, or lies about safer sex practices, that is still a violation of trust.
If polyamory is not consensual, it is not polyamory[8]. Consent is what separates ethical non-monogamy from infidelity. In consensual non-monogamy, all partners explicitly agree that each person may have romantic or sexual relationships with others[7].
This is why clear agreements matter. Couples and groups often create boundaries around time, communication, safer sex, and disclosure. Breaking those agreements can be just as painful as cheating in a monogamous relationship. The structure does not eliminate the need for trust; it changes the terms.
Myth: Everyone in non-monogamy is doing it the same way
Consensual non-monogamy is an umbrella term that includes swinging, open relationships, and polyamory, and these forms differ significantly[7]. Swinging typically involves couples having sex with other couples as a recreational activity[2]. Open relationships usually allow partners to have sex outside the relationship without necessarily forming romantic bonds[7]. Polyamory emphasizes long-term, loving relationships with multiple partners[7].
Even within polyamory, there is no single model. Some people have hierarchical arrangements with primary and secondary partners, while others prefer non-hierarchical structures with multiple co-primary partners or only non-primary partners[5]. In one 2017 online convenience sample, about 55% of polyamorous participants identified with co-primary or non-primary configurations[5].
The degree of emotional and physical intimacy between partners can vary widely[3]. Some relationships are primarily sexual, while others are deeply romantic. Assuming that all non-monogamous people follow the same rules or want the same things is a common mistake. Asking about someone's specific agreements is far more useful than relying on labels.
Myth: Non-monogamy is rare and fringe
Consensual non-monogamy is more common than many people realize. Estimates suggest that 3% to 7% of Americans are in a consensually non-monogamous relationship at any given time, and around a quarter have tried it at some point in their lives[1]. A 2020 YouGov poll found that about one-third of US adults believe their ideal relationship is non-monogamous to some degree[1].
Interest is not limited to the United States. In a 2024 YouGov poll, 9% of Brits said they have been or would like to be in a polyamorous relationship[1]. Other research suggests that over 16% of people in the United States may want to try non-monogamy, and up to 10% may have tried it at some point[8].
Despite these numbers, stigma remains widespread. Consensually non-monogamous individuals face misunderstanding and negative stereotypes[1]. Part of the reason is that many people still do not know what polyamory actually means[8]. Greater visibility and accurate information can help reduce that stigma.
Frequently asked questions
Is polyamory just an excuse to sleep with other people?
No. Polyamory involves emotional and romantic connections with multiple partners, not just sexual activity. People choose it for many reasons, including having different needs met and feeling greater autonomy.
Do polyamorous people get jealous?
Yes, jealousy can happen in any relationship style. Many polyamorous people work through jealousy with communication, self-reflection, and clear agreements rather than assuming it means the relationship is failing.
Can a monogamous person date someone who is polyamorous?
Yes. These arrangements are sometimes called mono-poly relationships. They require honest conversations about boundaries, time, and expectations, but they can work when both people are willing.
Is non-monogamy riskier for STIs?
Not necessarily. People in consensually non-monogamous relationships often report more condom use and more frequent STI testing than monogamous people who have outside partners. Safer sex practices matter more than relationship labels.
Sources
- Non-monogamy – Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-monogamy
- Swinging (sexual practice) – Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swinging_(sexual_practice)
- Intimate relationship – Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intimate_relationship
- Conley et al. (2013). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc. PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23175520/
- Balzarini et al. (2019). Comparing Relationship Quality Across Different Types of Romantic Partners in Polyamorous and Monogamous Relationships. Archives of sexual behavior. PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31069571/
- Lehmiller (2015). A Comparison of Sexual Health History and Practices among Monogamous and Consensually Nonmonogamous Sexual Partners. The journal of sexual medicine. PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26395880/
- Rubel & Bogaert (2015). Consensual Nonmonogamy: Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Quality Correlates. Journal of sex research. PubMed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25189189/
- Your Guide to Polyamorous RelationshipsHealthline – Healthline. https://www.healthline.com/health/relationships/polyamorous
Facts in this article were taken from the sources above and rewritten in our own words. See our editorial policy. Found an error? Tell us.